Ask your data the same question twice.
Get two different answers.
A chat tool on top of your data answers everything you ask. Some answers are wrong, and nothing tells you which. The chart looks the same either way, and someone makes a decision on it.
“The real value would be in chatting with the data. If I tell that to my CFO, he's like: OK, let's go. But to get there, you need the data quality up at a certain level.”
- MondayGross margin in Q3 was 23.4%.
- TuesdayGross margin in Q3 was 19.8%.
Same question, same tool. Nothing tells you which is right.
From two answers to one you can check.
One metric, from its competing versions to an answer that shows its working. Whichever chat tool you use.
- 1Every version in one place
Why the answers differ.
Sales dashboard: revenue minus purchase price23.4%Finance report: freight included19.8%What you seeEach version of the metric, where it's calculated, and exactly where they differ.
- 2Ready to approve
One definition, tied to the real fields.
Gross margin · Owner: Finance
Net revenue minus cost of goods, freight included.
fact_sales.net_revenue · fact_sales.cogs · fact_freight.cost
ProposedOne definition and the fields behind it. The owner confirms or changes it.
Forward to Accept - 3Traceable
One answer, with its working.
Your chat tool, with Metagem context
Gross margin in Q3 was 19.8%.
Definition: net revenue minus cost of goods, freight included · Owner: Finance
The resultThe same question gets the same answer, any day of the week. And unclear questions get a question back, not a guess.
What you seeToday
- Every tool calculates metrics its own way.
- Unclear questions get confident answers.
- Nobody trusts the chat.
With Metagem
- Every version mapped, one agreed.
- Each metric tied to the real fields.
- The same answer any day of the week.